Comprensión de lectura

Instrucciones:

  • Lee con atención la lectura que a continuación se muestra
  • Usa el mouse para desplazarse hacia abajo en la lectura
  • Lee atentamente cada uno de los reactivos y selecciona la opción que consideres correcta.
  • Cuando hayas elegido tu respuesta, selecciona el botón de “siguiente pregunta”.
  • Al finalizar el examen, se mostrará el resultado que obtuviste, así como una retroalimentación de cada reactivo.

Lectura

The Great Fire of London
The summer of 1666 in London had been long, hot, and dry. Like everyone else, Thomas
Farriner, a baker, wanted the heat to end. His bakery shop occupied the ground floor of his
house in Pudding Lane. On the night of September 1, he carefully checked the six
fireplaces he used to bake bread to make sure the fires had been extinguished. Then he went
5upstairs to bed. He hadn’t checked his fireplaces carefully enough. Shortly after midnight,
the smell of smoke and the crackling of flame woke him up. His house was on fire! As the
flames licked upward, Farriner, his daughter, and a servant scrambled out a window and
onto the steep roof of their neighbor’s house. Farriner’s maidservant, however, was too
frightened. She stayed inside the house and perished in the fire.
10Farriner and his neighbors threw buckets of water on the inferno, their eyes
watering from the smoke and their lungs straining of air. The fire continued to burn.
Finally, the parish constables arrived and ordered the neighboring houses to be torn down
to keep the fire from spreading. When Farriner’s neighbors protested, Sir Thomas
Bloodworth, the lord mayor of London, backed them up. He didn’t realize how serious the
15fire was. He had made a fatal decision. By seven o’clock that morning¬¬¬¬— Sunday,
September 2, 1666— the fire was out of control. Pushed by an easterly gale, it roared
toward the River Thames and consumed everything in its path. Hundreds of houses,
riverfront warehouses, and structures lining London Bridge burned to the ground. Men,
women, and children rushed to save their furniture, clothing, and other belongings. Those
20who could afford it hastily hired boats to row their families and goods across the river to
safety.
King Charles II finally ordered buildings near the fire to be demolished, but he was
too late. As the day wore on, Londoners stopped trying to put out the flames and just fled.
Thousands clogged the narrow streets, pushing carts, carrying blankets filled with their
25possessions, pulling small children away from danger. Many stopped to pray at small
churches that had not yet been touched by flames; others kept moving. Firefighters found it
nearly impossible to worm their way through the crowds to the fire—not that their efforts
would have made much of a difference. Many simply gave up and joined the mass exodus.
As Monday, September 3 dawned, the fire rushed toward London’s commercial
30center. The Royal Exchange, home to numerous fancy shops, provided fodder for the
flames. The city’s wealthier residents, who at first did not believe the fire would ever reach
them, began to fear they would lose their worldly goods. In desperation, they paid poor
Londoners exorbitant amounts of money to pile their belongings in carts and move them
away from the fire. Not surprisingly, thievery was rampant. By that evening, the Thames
35was clogged with barges and smaller boats as shop-keepers tried to save their wares and
householders scrambled to salvage their belongings.
Charles became increasingly desperate. He ordered his brother James, the Duke of
York, to curb the chaos and organize firefighting efforts. Makeshift command posts soon
surrounded the fire, and James offered lots of money to lower-class men to control the fire.
40Using long hooks, bands of newly minted firefighters demolished many buildings in an
attempt to create a firebreak.
Not even their desperate efforts could prevent the fire from advancing westward
toward Whitehall Palace where Charles lived. During the early morning hours of Tuesday,
September 4, James and his band of firefighters stood watch at the River Fleet, praying that
45the river would douse the flames. But the flames jumped the river and quickly surrounded
the men on two sides. They fled, barely escaping with their lives. To the north, a man-made
firebreak barely slowed down the flames. In the late afternoon the fire leaped over it to
ravage the opulent shops lining Cheapside, one of London’s most important streets. The
Tower of London, which contained gunpowder stores, was also directly in the line of the
50fire. Had not firefighters successfully blocked the flames by blowing up houses near the
Tower, the gunpowder would have exploded in a huge ball of flame.
Enormous chunks of London had fallen prey to the Great Fire. But, Londoners
reasoned, the flames had eaten through wooden structures. Therefore, St. Paul’s Cathedral,
with its thick stone walls, should be fireproof. Using this logic, countless residents trekked
55to the cathedral, storing their belongings in its nooks and crannies. They did not take into
account that the cathedral, now nearly 600 years old, was under repair. The scaffolding that
fronted the building was tinder-dry wood. On Tuesday night, the scaffolding caught fire.
Soon the lead roof began to melt. The molten liquid ran down the street. Books stored in
the cathedral’s crypt went up with a loud swoosh, and stones flew from the building.
60As St. Paul’s Cathedral melted to the ground, the wind began to die down. The
firebreaks around the fire’s perimeter finally began to work. By Wednesday morning,
September 5, flames were guttering and going out. Small fires still crackled here and there,
but most of London was a smoking husk. Nearly all government buildings, thousands of
houses, and almost 100 parish churches smoldered. Well over half of London’s estimated
65half-million citizens—mostly the poor and middle-class—were left homeless. Many had
erected makeshift shelters in a large public park. Others walked aimlessly around the
smoldering streets, not knowing what to do next. According to official figures, only a few
people—one of them Farriner’s unfortunate maid— had died in the blaze. Others believed
that many more perished, but their bodies had been completely consumed.
70People were devastated, angry, and looking for someone to blame. Conspiracy
theories flew through the streets. Native-born Londoners looked suspiciously at foreigners,
especially French and Dutch immigrants. The French were longtime political enemies, and
at the time of the fire, England was involved in the Second Anglo-Dutch War. The Dutch,
according to rumor-mongers, wanted to cripple England so that they could control
75European trade. More and more people began to think that “sneaky foreigners” had set the
fires, hoping to drive honest Englishmen and women out of their homes and business.
Many claimed to have seen such people lobbing manmade firebombs into thatched roofs.
Furious mobs formed, beating anyone who looked suspicious; that is, anyone speaking
French or Dutch. One unfortunate young Frenchman—Robert Hubert— “confessed” to the
80crime. He could barely speak English, and was probably tortured. He was hanged a few
weeks later. Soon afterward, a sea captain came forward and said that Hubert had been
aboard his ship at the time of the fire.
The eagerness to hang Hubert was a reflection of a long-term animosity among the
English, French, and Dutch. The English had won the first Anglo-Dutch War in 1654, but
85had not succeeded in driving the Dutch out of the world market. When Charles II ascended
the throne in 1660, he helped to whip British citizens into a frenzy of anti-Dutch sentiment.
Everybody who could read got their hands on pamphlets that detailed Dutch atrocities
against the English.
The Great Fire of London was thus not just a fire. For thousands of Londoners who
90lost their homes, and for countless other Britons who hated the French and the Dutch, it
was a fearsome blaze designed to bring down the great power of England. While the city
was eventually rebuilt, the legacy of the Great Fire lived on. As John Evelyn observed,
“The conflagration was so universal, and the people so astonished that… there was nothing
heard, or seen, but crying out and lamentation.”
95The Great Fire of London was an unfortunate accident. But the underlying political
tensions were not. They were typical of what had been going on for many years in Western
Europe. The map of the continent had been undergoing changes for centuries before the
fire. It would continue to change many times after that.
100Davey, Frances E. A Brief Political and Geographic History of Europe: Where are
Prussia, Gaul, and the Holy Roman Empire?. Hockessin: Mitchell Publishers, 2008.